|
Apr 12, 2008 10:15am
|
so yesterday was a beautiful day, so my friends and i decided to go to the beach. |
|
Apr 12, 2008 12:24pm
|
what a great option that is. I looked it up and and it’s pretty neat. it sure beats parking too…and on a day like today (I’m sure it’s as hot in SD as it is in LA), that would come in handy. I’m still kind of sick, so I’m going to take a nice stroll to the beach myself today, which is, ahem, 1/2 mile away. :) |
|
Apr 13, 2008 03:22pm
|
Nice post! |
|
Apr 14, 2008 09:14am
|
wow that is convenient. I wish there was some form of public transpo around here other than a drumb trolley that is more a of a tour than actual transportation. |
|
Apr 16, 2008 09:47pm
|
omg we have like NO public transportation in FLA. I just recently went up north and there is no need for a car up there, they got all kinds of transportation!! which is great, it saves gas & money & really helps! public transportation should be availiable everywhere! |
|
Apr 27, 2008 12:16pm
|
Bostons is really the only place near here to get public transport. I’m so jealous of people who have it so easy! :) |
|
Apr 28, 2008 04:56pm
|
If you want to get anywhere in sydney you can take public transport…if you’re willing to pay. Quite honestly traffic included, it’s cheaper to run a car here than use our failing public transport system. I catch busses and trains and a tram every single day and not once have they been on time this week. I never used to complain about the public transport system here but the prices have just gone up and if anything the service standard has dropped. Its no wonder sydney siders revert to using cars. let me put it in monetary value for you…If my boyfriend and i share fuel costs we pay $30 each a week for transport door to door including weekend outings and shopping. If i catch my bus, train and tram to get to work it costs me $67 a week. When i lived 100kilometres from work it still only cost me $60 a week if i shared costs with my boyfriend. |
|
May 10, 2008 02:18am
|
This discussion of the economics of automobiles from http://www.phillycarshare.org is interesting: “Economics are a powerful force driving automobiles, because cars are such “lumpy” investments. It is possible to own one or two cars, for example, but not one tenth or one-and-a-half. Once a car is owned, almost all its costs become “sunk” and unrelated to miles driven. Consider that a ten-mile roundtrip in Philadelphia costs $2.60 on SEPTA but only 98 cents in gas. Driving seems cheap on the margin. Rationally, car owners choose to drive. What if we could flip those economics—if cars were virtually free to access but expensive to drive? What if owning cost $0, while gas cost $15 per gallon? We might expect massive changes in travel behavior. People probably would drive much less, choosing more often to walk, bike, and take transit. ” |
|
May 11, 2008 05:28pm
|
|
|
May 19, 2008 05:36am
|
|
|
May 19, 2008 05:39am
|
Can’t figure out why that last one came out that way, I guess I shouldn’t mess with the quotes. Just wanted to say Emily is only making a logical choice! |
